Skip to main content

Wage inequality across quantiles (Quantile Regression)

This illustrates quantile regression: the return to education is heterogeneous between low- and high-wage groups — something OLS (mean only) cannot reveal. Figures are illustrative.

Summary: estimate β(τ)\beta(\tau) of educ at quantiles τ\tau = 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 to see how education affects wages differently along the distribution.


Step 1 — Ideation

  • Question: does the return to education differ between high- and low-wage groups (glass-ceiling/floor effects)?

Step 2 — Literature Review

Wage-inequality literature; quantile effects of education.

Step 3 — Data Collection

Labor micro data (lnwage, educ, exper, controls) — as in the Mincer example.

Step 4 — Modeling

Choose the Quantile regression family → Quantile, with a list of τ\tau:

Qτ(lnwageiXi)=β0(τ)+β1(τ)educi+Q_{\tau}(\ln wage_i \mid X_i) = \beta_0(\tau) + \beta_1(\tau)\,educ_i + \dots

Illustrative results — educ coefficient by quantile (not real results):

Quantile τ\tauβ^1(τ)\hat{\beta}_1(\tau) (educ)
0.100.061
0.500.080
0.900.103

Sample interpretation: the return to education rises with the quantile (0.061 → 0.103) ⇒ education widens wage inequality (a larger effect for high earners). OLS gives a single mean (~0.08) that masks this difference.

* --- Wage inequality: Quantile Regression ---
sqreg lnwage educ exper female, quantiles(.10 .25 .50 .75 .90) reps(200)

* Compare coefficients across quantiles
estimates table, stats(N)

Step 5 — Reporting

Export a report + the quantile-process plot + replication code; SE by bootstrap.

Video tutorial

Video Tutorial: Running Quantile Regression in EcoLab

See also